↓ Skip to main content

Miocarditis aguda eosinofílica como presentación inicial de una vasculitis

Overview of attention for article published in Archivos de cardiología de México, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 237)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Miocarditis aguda eosinofílica como presentación inicial de una vasculitis
Published in
Archivos de cardiología de México, May 2021
DOI 10.24875/acm.20000393
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alejandro Junco-Vicente, Luis Caminal-Montero, José Rozado-Castaño

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,433,608
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Archivos de cardiología de México
#40
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,329
of 459,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivos de cardiología de México
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them