You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tercer Registro Nacional de Programas de Rehabilitación Cardiaca en México (RENAPREC III-2022
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archivos de cardiología de México, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.24875/acm.22000235 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jorge A. Lara-Vargas, Hermes Ilazarra-Lomelí, Marianna A. García-Saldivia, Alfredo D. Pineda-García, Eduardo A. Leyva-Valadez, Samuel Justiniano-Cordero, Roberto Sahagún-Olmos, Juana Zavala-Ramírez, Ma. Elena Cassaigne-Guasco, Edgar-F. Sánchez-Limón, Javier Castañeda-López, Norma Cerón-Enríquez, Andrés Ku-González, Rodolfo Arteaga-Martínez, Tania Hinojosa-López, Jéssica Vergara-Guzmán, Daniel I. Pérez-Vázquez, Pedro D. Gasca-Zamudio, Zulema L. Aranda-Ayala, Martha E. Vacío-Reyes, Marco A. Reza-Orozco, Miguel A. Alcocer-Gamboa, Pedro A. Hernández-González, Angélica A. Pérez-Reyes, Juan P. Núñez-Urquiza, Jesús Alonso-Sánchez, Sarahí Franco-Valles, Ricardo E. Romo-Escamilla, Patricia Nuriulú-Escobar, Iván Serna-Santamaría, Jorge Avilés-González, María C. Salgado-Solorio, Luz M. Muñoz-Gutiérrez, Pedro M. Mendoza-Díaz, Ángel Ávila-Estrada, Carlos Morales-Medina, Eduardo Lara-Vázquez, Paulina Rodríguez-Herrera, Ángel Ávila-Estrada, Carlos Morales-Medina, Eduardo Lara-Vázquez, Paulina Rodríguez-Herrera, María Galván-López, Georgina Segoviano-Mendoza, Fabiola De-la-Torre-Cruz, Cecilia Jiménez-Campos, Alejandra Ramírez-Meléndez, Alejandro Almaraz-Ríos, Mezthly González-Bonilla, Jessica Rojano-Castillo, María D. Rius-Suárez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#20,673,680
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Archivos de cardiología de México
#142
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,496
of 326,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivos de cardiología de México
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.