You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guía de práctica clínica mexicana para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de las dislipidemias y enfermedad cardiovascular aterosclerótica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archivos de cardiología de México, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.24875/acm.m22000081 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abel A Pavía-López, Marco A Alcocer-Gamba, Edith D Ruiz-Gastelum, José L Mayorga-Butrón, Roopa Mehta, Filiberto A Díaz-Aragón, Jorge A Aldrete-Velasco, Nitzia López-Juárez, Ivette Cruz-Bautista, Adolfo Chávez-Mendoza, Nikos C Secchi-Nicolás, Francisco J Guerrero-Martínez, Jorge E Cossio-Aranda, Victoria Mendoza-Zubieta, Guillermo Fanghänel-Salmon, Martha Valdivia-Proa, Luis Olmos-Domínguez, Carlos A Aguilar-Salinas, Luis Dávila-Maldonado, Armando Vázquez-Rangel, Vanina Pavia-Aubry, María de Los A Nava-Hernández, Carlos A Hinojosa-Becerril, Juan C Anda-Garay, Manuel O de Los Ríos-Ibarra, Ana C Berni-Betancourt, Julio López-Cuellar, Diego Araiza-Garaygordobil, Romina Rivera-Reyes, Gabriela Borrayo-Sánchez, Mónica Tapia-Hernández, Claudia V Cano-Nigenda, Arturo Guerra-López, Josué Elías-López, Marco A Figueroa-Morales, Bertha B Montaño-Velázquez, Liliana Velasco-Hidalgo, Ana L Rodríguez-Lozano, Claudia Pimentel-Hernández, María M Baquero-Hoyos, Felipe Romero-Moreno, Mario Rodríguez-Vega |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 7 | 39% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 50 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,779,717
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Archivos de cardiología de México
#9
of 242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,032
of 451,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivos de cardiología de México
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 242 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.