↓ Skip to main content

Úlcera marginal perforada tras bypass gástrico. ¿Cuál es el manejo ideal? A propósito de un caso

Overview of attention for article published in Cirugia y Cirujanos, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 453)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Úlcera marginal perforada tras bypass gástrico. ¿Cuál es el manejo ideal? A propósito de un caso
Published in
Cirugia y Cirujanos, November 2020
DOI 10.24875/ciru.20000255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luisa F Mogollón, Andrés Mendoza-Zuchini, Luis F Cabrera, Mauricio Pedraza, Gabriela Fuente-Navarrete, Cristina Jiménez

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,296,017
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cirugia y Cirujanos
#34
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,166
of 434,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cirugia y Cirujanos
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.