↓ Skip to main content

Buenas prácticas editoriales

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta médica de México, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Buenas prácticas editoriales
Published in
Gaceta médica de México, April 2023
DOI 10.24875/gmm.23000073
Authors

Ana C. Sepúlveda-Vildósola, Juan M. Abdo-Francis, Patricia Clark, Eduardo E. Montalvo-Javé, Raúl Carrillo-Esper

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 50%
Environmental Science 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta médica de México
#120
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,933
of 421,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta médica de México
#31
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.