↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Target Attainment Rates According to the 2016 and 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society Dyslipidemia Guidelines for…

Overview of attention for article published in Revista de investigación clínica, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 251)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Target Attainment Rates According to the 2016 and 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society Dyslipidemia Guidelines for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Published in
Revista de investigación clínica, November 2021
DOI 10.24875/ric.21000152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barış Şimşek, Duygu İnan, Tufan Çınar, Ahmet Cagdas-Yumurtaş, Veysel Ozan-Tanık, Gonul Zeren, İlhan İlker-Avcı, Can Yücel-Karabay, Barış Güngör, Lale Tokgozoğlu

Abstract

High-intensity statin (HIS) therapy is widely recommended for secondary prevention after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) dyslipidemia guidelines have lowered the target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, which necessitates a more frequent use of nonstatin therapies. The objectives of the study were to investigate the rate of LDL-C target attainment for secondary prevention in AMI patients. This retrospective investigation included 1360 patients diagnosed with AMI in a tertiary heart center. Lipid parameters were collected within 24 h of admission and within 1 year after discharge. The medications used were retrieved from medical records, and the lowest LDL-C levels after statin treatment were used to assess the effectiveness of the therapy. LDL-C target attainment was defined according to the 2016 ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guidelines as an LDL-C level of < 70 mg/dL and a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline. In addition, the rate of LDL-C target attainment according to the 2019 fromESC/EAS guidelines was defined as an LDL-C level of < 55 mg/dL and a ≥ 50% reduction baseline. In total, 502 (36.9%) and 247 (18.2%) patients reached the LDL-C targets according to the 2016 and 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, respectively. The admission LDL-C levels were significantly lower and HIS treatment was used more frequently in patients who subsequently attained the LDL-C goal. Remarkably, 461 (34%) patients failed to reach the LDL-C goals despite HIS treatment. Only 27 (1.9%) patients were prescribed ezetimibe. The rate of LDL-C goal attainment in AMI patients was low, which indicates the need for combination statin and non-statin lipid-lowering therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,340,497
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Revista de investigación clínica
#27
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,486
of 443,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de investigación clínica
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.