↓ Skip to main content

MUNDOS EM COLISÃO: catastrofismo e as fronteiras da ciência

Overview of attention for article published in Novos Estudos - CEBRAP, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MUNDOS EM COLISÃO: catastrofismo e as fronteiras da ciência
Published in
Novos Estudos - CEBRAP, July 2015
DOI 10.25091/s0101-3300201500020013
Authors

TOLEDO JR., JOAQUIM

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#15,853,124
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Novos Estudos - CEBRAP
#130
of 202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,928
of 264,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Novos Estudos - CEBRAP
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.