You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are the SUS and the Right to Health Incompatible with Universal Health Coverage? Challenging Misconceptions around the Concept of UHC in the Public Health Scholarship in Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Novos Estudos - CEBRAP, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.25091/s01013300202000030009 |
| Authors |
Daniel Wei Liang Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 10 | 59% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 65% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Novos Estudos - CEBRAP
#202
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#380,404
of 440,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Novos Estudos - CEBRAP
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.