↓ Skip to main content

Damage Control in Penetrating Liver Trauma: Fear of the Unknown

Overview of attention for article published in Colombia Médica, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 192)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Damage Control in Penetrating Liver Trauma: Fear of the Unknown
Published in
Colombia Médica, December 2020
DOI 10.25100/cm.v51i4.4422.4365
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos A Ordoñez, Michael W Parra, Mauricio Millán, Yaset Caicedo, Mónica Guzmán-Rodríguez, Natalia Padilla, Juan Carlos Salamea-Molina, Alberto García, Adolfo González-Hadad, Luis Fernando Pino, Mario Alain Herrera, Fernando Rodríguez-Holguín, José Julián Serna, Alexander Salcedo, Gonzalo Aristizábal, Claudia Orlas, Ricardo Ferrada, Thomas Scalea, Rao Ivatury

Abstract

The liver is the most commonly affected solid organ in cases of abdominal trauma. Management of penetrating liver trauma is a challenge for surgeons but with the introduction of the concept of damage control surgery accompanied by significant technological advancements in radiologic imaging and endovascular techniques, the focus on treatment has changed significantly. The use of immediately accessible computed tomography as an integral tool for trauma evaluations for the precise staging of liver trauma has significantly increased the incidence of conservative non-operative management in hemodynamically stable trauma victims with liver injuries. However, complex liver injuries accompanied by hemodynamic instability are still associated with high mortality rates due to ongoing hemorrhage. The aim of this article is to perform an extensive review of the literature and to propose a management algorithm for hemodynamically unstable patients with penetrating liver injury, via an expert consensus. It is important to establish a multidisciplinary approach towards the management of patients with penetrating liver trauma and hemodynamic instability. The appropriate triage of these patients, the early activation of an institutional massive transfusion protocol, and the early control of hemorrhage are essential landmarks in lowering the overall mortality of these severely injured patients. To fear is to fear the unknown, and with the management algorithm proposed in this manuscript, we aim to shed light on the unknown regarding the management of the patient with a severely injured liver.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 44%
Unknown 9 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,192,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Colombia Médica
#47
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,314
of 519,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Colombia Médica
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.