↓ Skip to main content

Cesarean section rates in Ecuador: a 13-year comparative analysis between public and private health systems

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cesarean section rates in Ecuador: a 13-year comparative analysis between public and private health systems
Published in
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, February 2017
DOI 10.26633/rpsp.2017.15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Tamara Acosta Castillo, Mauricio Olmedo-López, Luciana Armijos, Darío Ramírez, Ana Lucia Iturralde

Abstract

To demonstrate the prevalence of cesearean sections (C-sections) in Ecuador and their distribution between private and public health centers. An observational population-based study was conducted of patients discharged from public and private hospitals in Ecuador after a C-section or vaginal delivery. Data were collected by the Ecuadorian National Institute of Statistics and Census (INEC) between 2001 and 2013. The overall national C-section rate in the private health care system is double the rate in the public health care system. Over the 13 years of the study, C-sections accounted for 57.5% of births in the private sector, while the public sector proportion did not exceed 22.3%. Countrywide, less than 36% of C-sections were found to be clinically justified by parallel analysis of absolute or relative indications. Acute fetal distress (AFD) was more frequently reported in private centers compared to public ones (446 per 10 000 live births versus 274 per 10 000). Since 2001, the number of births by cesarean section increased by more than 50% (R2 = 0.7306, P < 0.05), with an annual growth rate of 4.03%. In Guayaquil, the largest city in Ecuador, up to 74% of live births occurred by C-section. National data show that C-sections are performed more frequently in Ecuador than the rate recommended by the World Health Organization, especially in the private health care system. Private centers also report higher rates of AFD, which implies that this diagnosis is either overused in private centers or underrecognized in public centers. Although several factors might be influencing these trends, no data are available to determine the relative importance of economics, practicality, and medical or personal concerns of mothers and physicians in deciding which method of delivery should be used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 9 11%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 25 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#16,057,393
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
#864
of 1,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,272
of 424,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.