You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The fallacy of science is science: the impact of conflict of interest in vaping articles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.26633/rpsp.2022.81 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dèsirée Vidaña-Perez, Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu, Erick Antonio-Ochoa, Sandra L. Ávila-Valdez, Inti Barrientos-Gutiérrez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Cuba | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,047,859
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
#139
of 1,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,767
of 449,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.