↓ Skip to main content

Directrices para los protocolos de ensayos clínicos de intervenciones con inteligencia artificial: la extensión SPIRIT-AI

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Directrices para los protocolos de ensayos clínicos de intervenciones con inteligencia artificial: la extensión SPIRIT-AI
Published in
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, February 2023
DOI 10.26633/rpsp.2024.12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha Cruz Rivera, Xiaoxuan Liu, An-Wen Chan, Alastair K. Denniston, Melanie J. Calvert, Grupo de Trabajo SPIRIT-AI y CONSORT-AI, Alastair K. Denniston, An-Wen Chan, Ara Darzi, Christopher Holmes, Christopher Yau, David Moher, Hutan Ashrafian, Jonathan J. Deeks, Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Livia Faes, Melanie J. Calvert, Pearse A. Keane, Samantha Cruz Rivera, Sebastian J. Vollmer, Xiaoxuan Liu, Aaron Y. Lee, Adrian Jonas, Andre Esteva, Andrew L. Beam, An-Wen Chan, Maria Beatrice Panico, Cecilia S. Lee, Charlotte Haug, Christophe J. Kelly, Christopher Yau, Cynthia Mulrow, Cyrus Espinoza, John Fletcher, David Moher, Dina Paltoo, Elaine Manna, Gary Price, Gary S. Collins, Hugh Harvey, James Matcham, Joao Monteiro, M. Khair ElZarrad, Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano, Luke Oakden-Rayner, Melanie J. Calvert, Melissa McCradden, Pearse A. Keane, Richard Savage, Robert Golub, Rupa Sarkar, Samuel Rowley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 50%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,027,571
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
#458
of 1,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,624
of 476,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
#10
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.