↓ Skip to main content

Resumen ejecutivo de ARIA 2016: vías integradas de atención para la medicina predictiva a lo largo del ciclo de vida en Argentina

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Alergia de Mexico, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resumen ejecutivo de ARIA 2016: vías integradas de atención para la medicina predictiva a lo largo del ciclo de vida en Argentina
Published in
Revista Alergia de Mexico, October 2017
DOI 10.29262/ram.v64i3.286
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Carlos Ivancevich, Hugo Neffen, Mario E. Zermotti, Estrella Asayag, Ariel Blua, Alberto Cicerán, Edgardo J. Jares, Alberto J. Lavrut, Jorge F. Máspero, Ioana Agache, Claus Bachert, Anna Bedbrook, Giorgio W. Canonica, Thomas B. Casale, Álvaro A. Cruz, Wytske J. Fokkens, Peter W. Hellings, Boleslaw Samolinski, Jean Bousquet

Abstract

The ARIA initiative was started during a World Health Organization workshop in 1999. The initial goals were to propose a new classification for allergic rhinitis, to promote the concept of multi-morbidity in asthma and rhinitis and to develop guidelines with stakeholders for world-wide use. ARIA is now focused on the implementation of emerging technologies for individualized and predictive medicine. MASK: MACVIA-Aria Sentinel Network uses mobile technology to develop care pathways that enable management by a multidisciplinary group or by patients themselves. An App for iOS and Android uses a visual analogue scale to assess symptom control and work productivity, as well as a clinical decision support system; it is associated with an interoperable tablet for health professionals. The escalation strategy uses recommendations of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing. The aim of ARIA's new approach is to provide an active and healthy life to people affected by rhinitis, regardless of age, gender or socioeconomic status, in order to reduce social and health inequalities caused by the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 10 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Unspecified 10 22%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2017.
All research outputs
#22,834,739
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Revista Alergia de Mexico
#131
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#294,692
of 335,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Alergia de Mexico
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.