↓ Skip to main content

Nutrición mineral del chilhuacle en tres etapas fenológicas

Overview of attention for article published in Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutrición mineral del chilhuacle en tres etapas fenológicas
Published in
Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas, February 2022
DOI 10.29312/remexca.v13i1.2894
Authors

Evelia Fajardo-Rebollar, Oscar Gabriel Villegas-Torres, María Andrade-Rodríguez, Héctor Sotelo-Nava, Francisco Perdomo Roldán, José Luis Viveros-Ceballos

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,640,728
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas
#6
of 47 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,200
of 523,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one scored the same or higher as 41 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them