↓ Skip to main content

Mysterious ureteral migration of a wooden toothpick from the digestive tract: case report and diagnostic considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Einstein (São Paulo), February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mysterious ureteral migration of a wooden toothpick from the digestive tract: case report and diagnostic considerations
Published in
Einstein (São Paulo), February 2022
DOI 10.31744/einstein_journal/2022rc5743
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Di Migueli, Ricardo De La Roca, Fernando Korkes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Einstein (São Paulo)
#283
of 577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,644
of 519,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Einstein (São Paulo)
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.