You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Idiopathic partial central diabetes insipidus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Einstein (São Paulo), February 2023
|
DOI | 10.31744/einstein_journal/2023rc0124 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Larissa Fabre, Viviane Calice da Silva |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 18% |
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 18% |
Mathematics | 1 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2022.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Einstein (São Paulo)
#283
of 577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,584
of 479,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Einstein (São Paulo)
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.