↓ Skip to main content

Benign cervical schwannoma with tracheal invasion

Overview of attention for article published in Einstein (São Paulo), February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Benign cervical schwannoma with tracheal invasion
Published in
Einstein (São Paulo), February 2024
DOI 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024rc0528
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonardo Lima Lorandi, Fabio Pupo Ceccon, Fabiano Mesquita Callegari, Carlos Eduardo Bacchi, Leonardo Haddad

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,762,904
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from Einstein (São Paulo)
#261
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,732
of 257,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Einstein (São Paulo)
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.