↓ Skip to main content

VALIDATION AND COMPARISON OF EQ-5D-3L AND SF-6D INSTRUMENTS IN A SPANISH PARKINSON´S DISEASE POPULATION SAMPLE.

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrición Hospitalaria, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
VALIDATION AND COMPARISON OF EQ-5D-3L AND SF-6D INSTRUMENTS IN A SPANISH PARKINSON´S DISEASE POPULATION SAMPLE.
Published in
Nutrición Hospitalaria, December 2015
DOI 10.3305/nh.2015.32.6.9765
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel Ángel Garcia-Gordillo, B Del Pozo-Cruz, J C Adsuar, J M Cordero-Ferrera, J M Abellan-Perpiñan, F I Sanchez-Martinez

Abstract

generic, preference-based Health- Related Quality of Life instruments are receiving growing attention in health-care decision-making process. In spite of this, to our knowledge, EQ-5D and SF-6D have never been compared in a Parkinson´s disease population sample. the aim of this paper was to assess the psychometric properties of both instruments in a Spanish PD population sample. a total sample of 133 patients were interviewed using EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D. The validity, level of agreement and sensitivity of both instruments were computed and then compared. The Spanish tariff has been used in both instruments. utilities of EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D have shown a strong correlation (r >0.50 and p.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Professor 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 12%
Sports and Recreations 2 12%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%