↓ Skip to main content

Direct medical cost of late rehabilitation in workers with conservatively managed proximal humerus fracture.

Overview of attention for article published in Acta ortopédica mexicana, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct medical cost of late rehabilitation in workers with conservatively managed proximal humerus fracture.
Published in
Acta ortopédica mexicana, January 2022
DOI 10.35366/106754
Pubmed ID
Authors

B I Navarrete-Peñaloza, H Hernández-Amaro

Abstract

Eighty percent of the Proximal humerus fractures are not displaced or minimally displaced and stable. The international treatment recommendation is conservative. Immobilization of the limb carries risk of stiffness, pain and decreased function. Currently being used rehabilitation programs with early mobilization of the injured shoulder within the first week post-fracture, with evidence of early functional and labor recovery and with no risk for displacement of fragments. However, in our country, these patients start rehabilitation late, which leads to a delay in the recovery of functionality and delay in returning to work, translating into increased costs. At the moment there is no national benchmark for the cost of this late-onset rehabilitation. From a non-probabilistic sample for convenience, were analyzed records of 52 patients, treated in the period from January to December 2019. Inclusion criteria were workers diagnosed with a proximal humeral fracture, conservative management; exclusion criteria were peripheral nerve injury, aggregate fracture or surgically treated. The mean direct medical cost was $19,090.69 Mexican pesos, directly proportional to the days of stay in the unit and disability. Late rehabilitation leads to more days of disability than recommended by the based guidelinesin the workload, therefore, higher cost.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Acta ortopédica mexicana
#14
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,603
of 515,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta ortopédica mexicana
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.