↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a multistep Pseudomonas aeruginosa eradication treatment protocol in children with cystic fibrosis in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of a multistep Pseudomonas aeruginosa eradication treatment protocol in children with cystic fibrosis in Brazil
Published in
Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2020
DOI 10.36416/1806-3756/e20180294
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara Riquena, Luiz Vicente Ribeiro Ferreira da Silva, Cleyde Myriam Aversa Nakaie, Marina Buarque de Almeida, Joaquim Carlos Rodrigues, Fabíola Villac Adde

Abstract

Although various strategies have been proposed for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), only a few employ multistep treatment in children colonized by that pathogen for the first time. The aim of this study was to describe the effectiveness of a three-phase eradication protocol, initiated after the first isolation of P. aeruginosa, in children with CF in Brazil. This was a retrospective real-life study in which we reviewed the medical records of pediatric CF patients in whom the eradication protocol was applied between June of 2004 and December of 2012. The three-phase protocol was guided by positive cultures for P. aeruginosa in airway secretions, and the treatment consisted of inhaled colistimethate and oral ciprofloxacin. Success rates were assessed after each phase, as well as cumulatively. During the study period, 47 episodes of P. aeruginosa colonization, in 29 patients, were eligible for eradication. Among the 29 patients, the median age was 2.7 years, 17 (59%) were male, and 19 (65%) had at least one F508del allele. All 29 patients completed the first phase of the protocol, whereas only 12 and 6 completed the second and third phases, respectively. Success rates for eradication in the three treatment phases were 58.6% (95% CI: 40.7-74.5), 50.0% (95% CI: 25.4-74.6), and 66.7% (95% CI: 30.0-90.3), respectively. The cumulative success rate was 93.1% (95% CI: 78.0-98.1). Treatment failure in all three phases occurred in only 2 patients. In this sample of patients, the multistep eradication protocol was effective and had a high success rate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Unknown 6 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%
Unknown 6 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#17,350,971
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pneumologia
#326
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,634
of 476,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pneumologia
#16
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.