↓ Skip to main content

Impact of a respiratory ICU rotation on resident knowledge and confidence in managing mechanical ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of a respiratory ICU rotation on resident knowledge and confidence in managing mechanical ventilation
Published in
Jornal de Pneumologia, January 2020
DOI 10.36416/1806-3756/e20190108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fátima Kiyoko Hayashi, Pedro Paulo Marino Rodrigues Ayres, Anna Miethke Morais, Mayson Laércio de Araújo Sousa, Carmen Sílvia Valente Barbas, Eduardo Leite Vieira Costa, Pedro Caruso, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira

Abstract

To develop and apply a competency-based test to assess learning among internal medicine residents during a respiratory ICU rotation at a university hospital. We developed a test comprising 19 multiple-choice questions regarding knowledge of mechanical ventilation (MV) and 4 self-assessment questions regarding the degree of confidence in the management of MV. The test was applied on the first and last day of a 30-day respiratory ICU rotation (pre-rotation and post-rotation, respectively). During the rotation, the residents had lectures, underwent simulator training, and shadowed physicians on daily bedside rounds focused on teaching MV management. Fifty residents completed the test at both time points. The mean score increased from 6.9 ± 1.2 (pre-rotation) to 8.6 ± 0.8 (post-rotation; p < 0.001). On questions regarding the approach to hypoxemia, the recognition of patient-ventilator asynchrony, and the recognition of risk factors for extubation failure, the post-rotation scores were significantly higher than the pre-rotation scores. Confidence in airway management increased from 6% before the rotation to 22% after the rotation (p = 0.02), whereas confidence in making the initial MV settings increased from 31% to 96% (p < 0.001) and confidence in adjusting the ventilator modes increased from 23% to 77% (p < 0.001). We developed a competency-based test to assess knowledge of MV among residents before and after an rotation in a respiratory ICU. Resident performance increased significantly after the rotation, as did their confidence in caring for patients on MV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Master 4 11%
Lecturer 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#20,726,252
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pneumologia
#464
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358,816
of 476,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pneumologia
#26
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.