↓ Skip to main content

Impact of prone positioning on patients with COVID-19 and ARDS on invasive mechanical ventilation: a multicenter cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pneumologia, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of prone positioning on patients with COVID-19 and ARDS on invasive mechanical ventilation: a multicenter cohort study
Published in
Jornal de Pneumologia, April 2022
DOI 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210374
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marieta C A Cunha1, Jociane Schardonga, Natiele Camponogara Righi2,3, Adriana Claudia Lunardi4, Guadalupe Nery de Sant’Anna4, Larissa Padrão Isensee4, Rafaella Fagundes Xavier4, Kaciane Roberta Brambatti2, José Eduardo Pompeu4, Fabiano Frâncio5, Luiza Martins Faria6, Rozana Astolfi Cardoso7, Antonio Marcos Vargas da Silva2, Camila de Christo Dorneles8, Roberta Weber Werle8, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira1, Rodrigo Della Méa Plentz2,3, Celso R F Carvalho4

Abstract

To identify factors that lead to a positive oxygenation response and predictive factors of mortality after prone positioning. This was a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study involving seven hospitals in Brazil. Inclusion criteria were being > 18 years of age with a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, being on invasive mechanical ventilation, having a PaO2/FIO2 ratio < 150 mmHg, and being submitted to prone positioning. After the first prone positioning session, a 20 mmHg improvement in the PaO2/FIO2 ratio was defined as a positive response. The study involved 574 patients, 412 (72%) of whom responded positively to the first prone positioning session. Multiple logistic regression showed that responders had lower Simplified Acute Physiology Score III (SAPS III)/SOFA scores and lower D-dimer levels (p = 0.01; p = 0.04; and p = 0.04, respectively). It was suggested that initial SAPS III and initial PaO2/FIO2 were predictors of oxygenation response. The mortality rate was 69.3%. Increased risk of mortality was associated with age (OR = 1.04 [95 CI: 1.01-1.06]), time to first prone positioning session (OR = 1.18 [95 CI: 1.06-1.31]), number of sessions (OR = 1.31 [95% CI: 1.00-1.72]), proportion of pulmonary impairment (OR = 1.55 [95% CI: 1.02-2.35]), and immunosuppression (OR = 3.83 [95% CI: 1.35-10.86]). Our results show that most patients in our sample had a positive oxygenation response after the first prone positioning session. However, the mortality rate was high, probably due to the health status and the number of comorbidities of the patients, as well as the severity of their disease. Our results also suggest that SAPS III and the initial PaO2/FIO2 predict the oxygenation response; in addition, age, time to first prone positioning, number of sessions, pulmonary impairment, and immunosuppression can predict mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 1 3%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 21 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Unspecified 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 23 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2022.
All research outputs
#22,835,295
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pneumologia
#556
of 719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#379,704
of 446,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pneumologia
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.