You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Calcificação Miocárdica Padrão Helicoidal de Torrent Guasp
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.36660/abc.20210370 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Marta Abraham-Foscolo, Rocío Blanco, Juan Guido Chiabrando, María Clara Llamedo, Diego Pérez de Arenaza, Mariano L Falconi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,037,196
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#166
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,470
of 446,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.