↓ Skip to main content

Diretriz Conjunta sobre Tromboembolismo Venoso – 2022

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 1,223)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
339 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diretriz Conjunta sobre Tromboembolismo Venoso – 2022
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, April 2022
DOI 10.36660/abc.20220213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Cristina Lopes Albricker, Cláudia Maria Vilas Freire, Simone Nascimento Dos Santos, Monica Luiza de Alcantara, Mohamed Hassan Saleh, Armando Luis Cantisano, José Aldo Ribeiro Teodoro, Carmen Lucia Lascasas Porto, Salomon Israel do Amaral, Orlando Carlos Gloria Veloso, Ana Cláudia Gomes Pereira Petisco, Fanilda Souto Barros, Márcio Vinícius Lins de Barros, Adriano José de Souza, Marcone Lima Sobreira, Robson Barbosa de Miranda, Domingos de Moraes, Carlos Gustavo Yuji Verrastro, Alexandre Dias Mançano, Ronaldo de Souza Leão Lima, Valdair Francisco Muglia, Cristina Sebastião Matushita, Rafael Willain Lopes, Artur Martins Novaes Coutinho, Diego Bromfman Pianta, Alair Augusto Sarmet Moreira Damas Dos Santos, Bruno de Lima Naves, Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira, Carlos Eduardo Rochitte

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 339 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 23%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Lecturer 2 4%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 30 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 33 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 210. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2023.
All research outputs
#190,031
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#3
of 1,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,753
of 450,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,223 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.