You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diretriz de Miocardites da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia – 2022
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.36660/abc.20220412 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcelo Westerlund Montera, Fabiana G Marcondes-Braga, Marcus Vinícius Simões, Lídia Ana Zytynski Moura, Fabio Fernandes, Sandrigo Mangine, Amarino Carvalho de Oliveira Júnior, Aurea Lucia Alves de Azevedo Grippa de Souza, Bárbara Maria Ianni, Carlos Eduardo Rochitte, Claudio Tinoco Mesquita, Clerio F de Azevedo Filho, Dhayn Cassi de Almeida Freitas, Dirceu Thiago Pessoa de Melo, Edimar Alcides Bocchi, Estela Suzana Kleiman Horowitz, Evandro Tinoco Mesquita, Guilherme H Oliveira, Humberto Villacorta, João Manoel Rossi Neto, João Marcos Bemfica Barbosa, José Albuquerque de Figueiredo Neto, Louise Freire Luiz, Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar, Luis Beck-da-Silva, Luiz Antonio de Almeida Campos, Luiz Cláudio Danzmann, Marcelo Imbroise Bittencourt, Marcelo Iorio Garcia, Monica Samuel Avila, Nadine Oliveira Clausell, Nilson Araujo de Oliveira, Odilson Marcos Silvestre, Olga Ferreira de Souza, Ricardo Mourilhe-Rocha, Roberto Kalil Filho, Sadeer G Al-Kindi, Salvador Rassi, Silvia Marinho Martins Alves, Silvia Moreira Ayub Ferreira, Stéphanie Itala Rizk, Tiago Azevedo Costa Mattos, Vitor Barzilai, Wolney de Andrade Martins, Heinz-Peter Schultheiss |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 39% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#18,836,571
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#742
of 1,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,568
of 438,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.