↓ Skip to main content

Dados de Vida Real sobre o Uso da Hidroxicloroquina ou da Cloroquina Combinadas ou Não à Azitromicina em Pacientes com Covid-19: Uma Análise Retrospectiva no Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 1,218)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dados de Vida Real sobre o Uso da Hidroxicloroquina ou da Cloroquina Combinadas ou Não à Azitromicina em Pacientes com Covid-19: Uma Análise Retrospectiva no Brasil
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, October 2023
DOI 10.36660/abc.20220935
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maíra Viana Rego Souza-Silva, Daniella Nunes Pereira, Magda Carvalho Pires, Isabela Muzzi Vasconcelos, Alexandre Vargas Schwarzbold, Diego Henrique de Vasconcelos, Elayne Crestani Pereira, Euler Roberto Fernandes Manenti, Felício Roberto Costa, Filipe Carrilho de Aguiar, Fernando Anschau, Frederico Bartolazzi, Guilherme Fagundes Nascimento, Heloisa Reniers Vianna, Joanna d'Arc Lyra Batista, Juliana Machado-Rugolo, Karen Brasil Ruschel, Maria Angélica Pires Ferreira, Leonardo Seixas de Oliveira, Luanna Silva Monteiro Menezes, Patricia Klarmann Ziegelmann, Marcela Gonçalves Trindade Tofani, Maria Aparecida Camargos Bicalho, Matheus Carvalho Alves Nogueira, Milton Henriques Guimarães-Júnior, Rúbia Laura Oliveira Aguiar, Danyelle Romana Alves Rios, Carisi Anne Polanczyk, Milena Soriano Marcolino

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 9 69%
Librarian 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 9 69%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,338,738
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#48
of 1,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,784
of 358,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.