You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
To Close or not to Close PFOs in Cryptogenic Stroke, an Evolving Question
|
---|---|
Published in |
"International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences", January 2020
|
DOI | 10.36660/ijcs.20200128 |
Authors |
Alex Felix, Monica Luiza de Alcantara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 5 | 22% |
Spain | 2 | 9% |
Australia | 2 | 9% |
Bulgaria | 1 | 4% |
Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
Greece | 1 | 4% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
Egypt | 1 | 4% |
Poland | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 74% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
Scientists | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 40% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,173,180
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from "International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences"
#14
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,607
of 479,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from "International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences"
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.