You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
First Evaluation of the Brazilian Advanced Life Support Training (TECA A)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
"International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences", January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.36660/ijcs.20220199 |
| Authors |
Fabrício Nogueira Furtado, Antonio Carlos de Camargo Carvalho, Iran Gonçalves, Manoel Fernandes Canesin, Sergio Timerman, Rodrigo Marques Gonçalves, Daniela Frizon Alfieri, Dirceu Almeida |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2023.
All research outputs
#17,301,727
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from "International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences"
#141
of 312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,826
of 475,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from "International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences"
#31
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 312 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.