You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of water and osmotic potentials on Vigna unguiculata stress response
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.36783/18069657rbcs20200070 |
| Authors |
Hidelblandi Farias de Melo, Edivan Rodrigues de Souza, Pablo Rugero Magalhães Dourado, Cíntia Maria Teixeira Lins, Hugo Rafael Bentzen Santos, Danilo Rodrigues Monteiro, Martha Katharinne Silva Souza Paulino, Brivaldo Gomes de Almeida, Monaliza Alves dos Santos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#20,669,432
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
#185
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#356,458
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.