You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chlorella pyrenoidosa supplementation increased the concentration of unsaturated fatty acids in the rumen fluid of cattle fed a low-quality tropical forage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.37496/rbz4920200042 |
| Authors |
Diogo Fleury Azevedo Costa, Simon Paul Quigley, Peter Isherwood, Stuart Ross McLennan, Xiao Qiao Sun, Steven James Gibbs, Dennis Paul Poppi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 50% |
| Chile | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2020.
All research outputs
#8,433,608
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
#44
of 352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,801
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
#3
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 352 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.