↓ Skip to main content

Vinos tpicos de Chile: ascenso y declinacin del chacol (1810-2015)

Overview of attention for article published in Idesia (Arica), August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vinos tpicos de Chile: ascenso y declinacin del chacol (1810-2015)
Published in
Idesia (Arica), August 2015
DOI 10.4067/s0718-34292015000300014
Authors

Pablo Lacoste, Amalia Castro, Flix Briones, Felipe Cussen, Natalia Soto, Bibiana Rendn, Fernando Mujica, Paulette Aguilera, Carolina Cofr, Emiliano Nez, Michelle L Adunka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Idesia (Arica)
#17
of 71 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,575
of 276,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Idesia (Arica)
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.