↓ Skip to main content

Cmo han cambiado los estudiantes que ingresan a medicina? Aprendizaje autodirigido y antecedentes acadmicos de las cohortes 2010 a 2014 de una universidad tradicional

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Médica de Chile, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cmo han cambiado los estudiantes que ingresan a medicina? Aprendizaje autodirigido y antecedentes acadmicos de las cohortes 2010 a 2014 de una universidad tradicional
Published in
Revista Médica de Chile, July 2017
DOI 10.4067/s0034-98872017000700934
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristhian E Pérez-Villalobos, Eduardo A Fasce-Henry, Javiera A Ortega-Bastidas, Liliana E Ortiz-Moreira, Nancy Bastías-Vega, Carolina E Bustamante-Durán, Pilar Ibáñez-Gracia, Carolina G Márquez-Urrizola, Macarena Delgado-Rivera, Rocío Glaría-López

Abstract

The widespread growth of higher education is increasing the heterogeneity of university students in terms of socioeconomic characteristics, academic story and cultural background. Medical schools are not an exception of this phenomenon. To compare the academic background and self-directed learning behavior of students who entered to a public medial school between 2010 and 2014. A non-probabilistic sample of 527 medical students aged between 17 and 29 years (60% men), was studied. Their academic information was collected from the University data base; they answered the Self-directed learning readiness scale of Fisher. Students from the 2014 cohort had higher high school grades than their counterparts. The scores in mathematics of the Scholarship Aptitude Test (SAT) were higher in the cohorts of 2010 and 2011. Those of the sciences test were superior in the 2013 cohort. The 2014 cohort had the lower general score of self-directed learning behaviors. The lower SAT and self-directed learning scores of the students entering medical school in 2014, indicate the progressive increase in the heterogeneity of Medical students.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Médica de Chile
#1,066
of 1,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,158
of 326,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Médica de Chile
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,283 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.