↓ Skip to main content

Portacin de Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxignico tipo A, en frotis nasofarngeos en manipuladores de alimentos

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Médica de Chile, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Portacin de Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxignico tipo A, en frotis nasofarngeos en manipuladores de alimentos
Published in
Revista Médica de Chile, December 2017
DOI 10.4067/s0034-98872017001201559
Pubmed ID
Authors

María Paula Alarcón-Lavín, Carolina Oyarzo, Carlos Escudero, Fabiola Cerda-Leal, Francisco J Valenzuela

Abstract

Background Staphylococcus aureus produces 11 serotypes of endotoxins that may cause food poisoning. Aim To determine the prevalence of type A enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus carriage among food service workers in Chillan, Chile. Material and Methods Pharyngeal swabs were obtained from 100 food service workers and were cultured in Agar plates. After identifying the presence of Staphylococcus aureus, DNA was extracted to identify type A toxin by conventional PCR. Results Thirty eight percent of samples were colonized with Staphylococcus aureus. Among these, 26% were toxin A producers. Conclusions Half of the sampled workers carried Staphylococcus aureus and a quarter of these produced type A enterotoxin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 21%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 41 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Engineering 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 42 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2022.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Médica de Chile
#615
of 1,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,355
of 444,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Médica de Chile
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,283 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.