You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Consumo de lácteos y riesgo de cáncer colorrectal: Una revisión de la literatura científica
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista chilena de nutrición órgano oficial de la Sociedad Chilena de Nutrición Bromatología y Toxicología, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.4067/s0717-75182021000300405 |
Authors |
Kathleen Carpio, Verónica Cornejo, María Jesús Leal-Witt, Samuel Durán-Agüero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 3 | 43% |
Chile | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,126,533
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Revista chilena de nutrición órgano oficial de la Sociedad Chilena de Nutrición Bromatología y Toxicología
#71
of 293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,284
of 459,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista chilena de nutrición órgano oficial de la Sociedad Chilena de Nutrición Bromatología y Toxicología
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.