You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aluminium hydro(oxide)–based (AO) adsorbent for defluoridation of drinking water: Optimisation, performance comparison, and field testing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Water SA, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.4314/wsa.v41i1.15 |
| Authors |
E Mulugeta, F Zewge, CA Johnson, BS Chandravanshi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 5 | 17% |
| Engineering | 3 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Water SA
#42
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,885
of 361,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water SA
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them