You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aquatic herbaceous plants of the Amazon floodplains: state of the art and research needed
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.4322/actalb.02202006 |
| Authors |
Maria Teresa Fernandez Piedade, Wolfgang Junk, Sammya Agra D'Ângelo, Florian Wittmann, Jochen Schöngart, Keillah Mara do Nascimento Barbosa, Aline Lopes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 20% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 26% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia
#35
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,120
of 172,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them