↓ Skip to main content

Human-animal relationships: from daily life to animal-assisted therapies.

Overview of attention for article published in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human-animal relationships: from daily life to animal-assisted therapies.
Published in
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2011
DOI 10.4415/ann_11_04_12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marine Grandgeorge, Martine Hausberger

Abstract

Humans have a long history of relationship with domestic animals and nowadays pets often act as "social substitutes" through bonding. There is some evidence that pet presence at home may induce well being in people and the development of social skills in children. Animal assisted therapies aim at developing these skills in patients on the basis of human animal interactions. Experimental data obtained on animal models suggest that this is indeed a promising line. There is however a lack of clear scientific data that would help defines what the most appropriate procedures or species may be. Improvements are observed, but again sound scientific data are mostly missing. Attention must be given to the welfare of the animals being used.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 206 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 20%
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Professor 14 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 48 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 22 10%
Social Sciences 16 8%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 52 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,572,103
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#62
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,965
of 190,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.