↓ Skip to main content

The potential role of garlic (Allium sativum) against the multi-drug resistant tuberculosis pandemic: a review.

Overview of attention for article published in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The potential role of garlic (Allium sativum) against the multi-drug resistant tuberculosis pandemic: a review.
Published in
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2011
DOI 10.4415/ann_11_04_18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catia Dini, Alessia Fabbri, Andrea Geraci

Abstract

Worldly data show the increasing incidence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and particularly of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). In developing countries, TB control programmes are overwhelmed by the complexity of treating MDR-TB infected people, as current tools and therapies are inadequate. MDR-TB could become the main form of TB. Risk factors that make South Africa into one of the main epicentres are analysed. A review of the studies carried out about antitubercular properties of Allium sativum both in vitro and in vivo is provided. The researches about the garlic extracts effectiveness against clinical isolates of MDR-TB are of scientific importance. Allium sativum offers a hope for developing alternative drugs. The involvement of traditional healers (TH) in the TB health management could facilitate the administration of garlic extracts to the infected patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 95 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 21%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Lecturer 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Chemistry 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 27 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#125
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,233
of 190,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.