↓ Skip to main content

Invertebrate welfare: an overlooked issue.

Overview of attention for article published in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 279)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Invertebrate welfare: an overlooked issue.
Published in
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2013
DOI 10.4415/ann_13_01_04
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelsey Horvath, Dario Angeletti, Giuseppe Nascetti, Claudio Carere

Abstract

While invertebrates make up the majority of animal species, their welfare is overlooked compared to the concern shown to vertebrates. This fact is highlighted by the near absence of regulations in animal research, with the exception of cephalopods in the European Union. This is often justified by assumptions that invertebrates do not experience pain and stress while lacking the capacity for higher order cognitive functions. Recent research suggests that invertebrates may be just as capable as vertebrates in experiencing pain and stress, and some species display comparable cognitive capacities. Another obstacle is the negative view of invertebrates by the public, which often regards them as pests with no individual personalities, gastronomic entities, or individuals for scientific experimentation without rules. Increasingly, studies have revealed that invertebrates possess individual profiles comparable to the personalities found in vertebrates. Given the large economic impact of invertebrates, developing certain attitude changes in invertebrate welfare may be beneficial for producers while providing higher welfare conditions for the animals. While the immense number and type of species makes it difficult to suggest that all invertebrates will benefit from increased welfare, in this review we provide evidence that the topic of invertebrate welfare should be revisited, more thoroughly investigated, and in cases where appropriate, formally instituted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 200%
Portugal 1 100%
Germany 1 100%
Czechia 1 100%
Italy 1 100%
Canada 1 100%
United States 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 4900%
Student > Master 30 3000%
Researcher 25 2500%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 2300%
Student > Postgraduate 14 1400%
Other 20 2000%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 9500%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 1100%
Environmental Science 8 800%
Social Sciences 6 600%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 500%
Other 24 2400%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,486,413
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#14
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,675
of 289,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.