You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A desk review on institutional and non-institutional organizations active in the field of migrant's health in the WHO European Region.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.4415/ann_15_04_11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Loredana Ingrosso, Tanja Schmidt, Jamila Sherally, Matteo Dembech, Sara Barragan Montes, Rita Sa Machado, Giuseppe Annunziata, Giovanni Rezza, Santino Severoni |
| Abstract |
Migrants have problematic access to health-care; non-institutional organizations (NGOs), as well as institutional bodies may play a role in facilitating their access to mainstream health care. Our research reviews actions that address the need of migrants in terms of health care in order to understand how, where, and who participates in this effort. Data were from desk or web research, declaration from organisations and their websites, information from WHO Country Offices. 154 NGOs were identified in the WHO European Region. 58% were direct health care providers while the remaining provided either mediation services or were part of a network organization. 173 national institutes (GOVs) were found; less than the 20% were directly or indirectly involved in health care, whereas the majority were involved in research, policy development, international relations and human rights. Some gaps, a certain fragmentation and lack of coordination were identified. WHO can play an overarching role in the exchange of expertise and harmonisation of the efforts in this field. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 300% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 200% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 200% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 200% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
| Other | 2 | 200% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 500% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 300% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 200% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 100% |
| Other | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#62
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,298
of 359,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.