You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of cannabidiol-rich cannabis extract in children with autism spectrum disorder: randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.47626/2237-6089-2021-0396 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Estácio Amaro da Silva, Wandersonia Moreira Brito Medeiros, João Paulo Mendes Dos Santos, João Marçal Medeiros de Sousa, Filipe Barbosa da Costa, Katiúscia Moreira Pontes, Thaís Cavalcanti Borges, Carlos Espínola, Ana Hermínia Andrade E Silva, Eliane Lima Guerra Nunes, Nelson Torro Alves, Marine Diniz da Rosa, Katy Lísias Gondim Dias de Albuquerque |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 10 | 16% |
United States | 8 | 13% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 35 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 52 | 84% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
Scientists | 4 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 16 | 23% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Researcher | 4 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 16 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 28 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#796,610
of 25,918,061 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
#7
of 280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,768
of 362,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them