↓ Skip to main content

Mortalidade por acidentes de trânsito e homicídios em Curitiba, Paraná, 1996-2011

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mortalidade por acidentes de trânsito e homicídios em Curitiba, Paraná, 1996-2011
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, January 2016
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742016000100010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mayckel da Silva Barreto, Elen Ferraz Teston, Maria do Rosário Dias de Oliveira Latorre, Thais Aidar de Freitas Mathias, Sonia Silva Marcon

Abstract

to describe trends in mortality due to homicides and traffic accidents among people living in Curitiba, Parana, Brazil, from 1996 to 2011. this is an ecological time-series study using National Mortality Information System data; trend analysis was performed by polynomial regression models according to sex. the mortality coefficient due to traffic accidents among males declined from 61.7 in 1996 to 28.4 in 2011 (-46%), whilst among females it decreased from 16.5 to 7.3 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants (-44.2%); in turn, the mortality coefficient for homicides among males rose from 32.5 to 69.3 (+113.2%), whilst among females it rose from 4.4 to 5.3 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants (+20.4%). mortality due to homicides increased; prevention strategies to tackle violence should be aimed at the specificities of external causes and greater male exposure to these injuries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Student > Postgraduate 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Professor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Engineering 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2016.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#176
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,263
of 399,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.