You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estratégias de controle do Aedes aegypti: uma revisão
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.5123/s1679-49742016000200017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana Laura de Sene Amâncio Zara, Sandra Maria dos Santos, Ellen Synthia Fernandes-Oliveira, Roberta Gomes Carvalho, Giovanini Evelim Coelho |
| Abstract |
to describe the main strategies to control Aedes aegypti, with emphasis on promising technological innovations for use in Brazil. this study is a non-systematic review of the literature. several technologies have been developed as alternatives in the control of Ae. aegypti, using different mechanisms of action, such as selective monitoring of the infestation, social interventions, dispersing insecticides, new biological control agents and molecular techniques for population control of mosquitoes, also considering the combination between them. Evolving technologies require evaluation of the effectiveness, feasibility and costs of implementation strategies as complementary to the actions already recommended by the National Program for Dengue Control. the integration of different compatible and effective vector control strategies, considering the available technologies and regional characteristics, appears to be a viable method to try to reduce the infestation of mosquitoes and the incidence of arbovirus transmitted by them. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 568 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 567 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 123 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 105 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 46 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 5% |
| Researcher | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 73 | 13% |
| Unknown | 164 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 93 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 60 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 122 | 21% |
| Unknown | 180 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#14,915,476
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#152
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,981
of 353,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.