You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tendência da incidência de dengue no Brasil, 2002-2012
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.5123/s1679-49742016000400006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Wendt Böhm, Caroline dos Santos Costa, Rosália Garcia Neves, Thaynã Ramos Flores, Bruno Pereira Nunes, Andrea Wendt Böhm, Caroline dos Santos Costa, Rosália Garcia Neves, Thaynã Ramos Flores, Bruno Pereira Nunes |
| Abstract |
to analyze dengue incidence trend in Brazil from 2002 to 2012. this was an ecological study with data of the Information System for Notifiable Diseases (Sinan); the incidence rate was calculated by age groups, states and macroregions, through Prais-Winsten regression. dengue incidence rates in Brazil, in 2002 and 2012, were of 401.6 and 301.5 per 100,000 inhabitants, respectively; annual increment rates were stable (21.4%; 95%CI -19.8;83.7) in most of the states, except for Alagoas (38.9%; 95%CI 5.1;83.5) and Tocantins (50.4%; 95%CI 12.6;100.7); the North Region was the only region to present increase trend in the incidence of dengue. although rates have remained stable in most of the states, they are still high in Brazil; broader public policies focusing on new dengue control strategies are necessary. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,740,207
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#162
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,569
of 332,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.