↓ Skip to main content

Estratificação de municípios brasileiros para avaliação de desempenho em saúde

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estratificação de municípios brasileiros para avaliação de desempenho em saúde
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, October 2016
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742016000400010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Cristina Marino Calvo, Josimari Telino de Lacerda, Claudia Flemming Colussi, Ione Jayce Ceola Schneider, Thiago Augusto Hernandes Rocha

Abstract

to propose and present a stratification of Brazilian municipalities into homogeneous groups for evaluation studies of health management performance. this was a methodological study, with selected indicators which classify municipalities according to conditions that influence the health management and population size; data for the year 2010 were collected from demographic and health databases; correlation tests and factor analysis were used. seven strata were identified - Large-sized; Medium-sized with favorable, regular or unfavorable influences; and Small-sized with favorable, regular or unfavorable influences -; there was a concentration of municipalities with favorable influences in strata with better purchasing power and funding, as well as a concentration of municipalities with unfavorable influences in the North and Northeast regions. the proposed classification grouped similar municipalities regarding influential factors in health management, which allowed the identification of comparable groups of municipalities, setting up a consistent alternative to performance evaluation studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Professor 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 25 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 27 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#273
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,455
of 332,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.