↓ Skip to main content

Procedimentos de medição da massa corporal infantil pelos agentes comunitários de saúde de Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, 2010-2011

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Procedimentos de medição da massa corporal infantil pelos agentes comunitários de saúde de Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, 2010-2011
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, July 2017
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742017000300015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guilherme Alvarenga Santos da Silva, Camilla Medeiros Macedo da Rocha, Maria Fernanda Larcher de Almeida, Flávia Farias Lima, Cleber Nascimento do Carmo, Cristiano Siqueira Boccolini, Beatriz Gonçalves Ribeiro, Rosely Sichieri, Jane de Carlos Santana Capelli, Guilherme Alvarenga Santos da Silva, Camilla Medeiros Macedo da Rocha, Maria Fernanda Larcher de Almeida, Flávia Farias Lima, Cleber Nascimento do Carmo, Cristiano Siqueira Boccolini, Beatriz Gonçalves Ribeiro, Rosely Sichieri, Jane de Carlos Santana Capelli

Abstract

to describe the measurement process of the body mass in children under seven years old, assisted by community health agents in primary health care units of the Family Health Strategy, in Macaé-RJ, Brazil. a descriptive study with community health agents who measured the body mass of children, from August 2010 to August 2011. ¾ (n=65) of the community health agents from Macaé Primary Health Care were observed in 196 measurements; in 66.8% of measurements, the professionals used domestic scales (p<0.001); 65.3% of the scales were put on uneven floor; the procedure 'undress the child' was followed in 18.4% of cases; of those, 72.2% were performed properly (p<0.001). failures in the technical procedures of measurement were detected, pointing to the need to expand the reflection and discussion on the impact of the measurements, which help determine the nutritional diagnose of children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 43%
Professor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#246
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,315
of 326,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.