↓ Skip to main content

Surto de síndrome de Guillain-Barré possivelmente relacionado à infecção prévia pelo vírus Zika, Região Metropolitana do Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil, 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surto de síndrome de Guillain-Barré possivelmente relacionado à infecção prévia pelo vírus Zika, Região Metropolitana do Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil, 2015
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, June 2018
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742018000200016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martha Elizabeth Brasil da Nóbrega, Emerson Luiz de Lima Araújo, Marcelo Yoshito Wada, Priscila Leal e Leite, George Santiago Dimech, Jadher Pércio

Abstract

to investigate the occurrence of GBS in the Metropolitan Region of Recife, PE, Brazil, 2015. this was a descriptive study using data from the Hospital Information System, National Pharmaceutical Services Management System and interviews; GBS cases were classified according to Brighton criteria and prior infection according to laboratory and clinical criteria. in 2015, the number of GBS hospitalizations had a threefold increase in comparison to 2014. We investigated 44 confirmed or probable GBS cases, of which 18 had symptoms of Zika infection up to 35 days before the occurrence of GBS, mainly rash; one case was laboratory-confirmed for Zika virus infection and one death was registered. the findings reinforce a possible relationship between GBS and Zika infection, given the absence of increased GBS occurrence in previous dengue epidemic years, absence of chikungunya transmission records, presence of clinical manifestations compatible with infection and a laboratory confirmation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 23%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Professor 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 31 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 40 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,305,383
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#101
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,922
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.