You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experiência do Comitê de Investigação de Óbitos por Arboviroses no Ceará em 2017: avanços e desafios
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.5123/s1679-49742019000300011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luciano Pamplona de Góes Cavalcanti, Kiliana Nogueira Farias da Escóssia, Adriana Rocha Simião, Pâmela Maria Costa Linhares, Antônio Afonso Bezerra Lima, Kilma Wanderley Lopes, Deborah Nunes de Melo Braga, Izabel Leticia Cavalcante Ramalho, Leda Maria Simões Mello, Regina Lúcia Sousa do Vale, Francisca Kalline de Almeida Barreto, Rhaquel de Morais Alves Barbosa Oliveira, Antônio Silva Lima, Fernanda Montenegro de Carvalho Araújo |
| Abstract |
to describe the experience and preliminary results of the Arbovirus Death Investigation Committee in Ceará, Brazil, in 2017. the Committee investigates and discusses all suspected cases of arbovirus deaths reported by the epidemiological surveillance service. a total of 443 suspected arbovirus deaths were reported, 220 (49.7%) of which were confirmed; of these, 88.2% were from chikungunya and 11.8% from dengue; the median age of chikungunya deaths was higher when compared to dengue (77 versus 56 years) and the time until death was also longer when compared to dengue (38 versus 12 days); median time for case closure was 54.5 days; in 2017, Ceará confirmed 80.4% of Brazilian chikungunya deaths. the investigation of deaths showed that CHIK viruses were responsible for the majority of arboviral deaths in the state of Ceará, in 2017. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#272
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#340,325
of 447,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.