↓ Skip to main content

Obtenção de medicamentos para hipertensão e diabetes no Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil: resultados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Obtenção de medicamentos para hipertensão e diabetes no Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil: resultados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, January 2016
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742016000100004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Sarmento Costa, Noemia Urruth Leão Tavares, Sotero Serrate Mengue, Marco Aurélio Pereira, Deborah Carvalho Malta, Jarbas Barbosa da Silva Júnior

Abstract

to describe the proportion of hypertensive and diabetic patients who reported getting medicines to control these diseases via the Brazilian People's Pharmacy Program, according to sociodemographic factors. this was a population-based descriptive study using 2013 National Health Survey data on individuals aged over 18 years. around one third of hypertensive individuals (35.9%; 95%CI 34.1-37.7) and more than half of those with diabetes (57.4%; 95%CI 54.2-60.2%) had got at least one kind of medication via the Program, there being some differences between the country's regions. Among patients with diabetes, higher rates of getting medication were found in black people (69.4%; 95%CI 60.8-77.9) and those with less schooling (0-8 years) (63.9%; 95%CI 60.2-67.7), with no significant differences between age groups or sex. obtaining at least one kind of medication to treat hypertension and diabetes via the Program was high, especially among the underprivileged.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 26%
Student > Master 8 14%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 21 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 24 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#324
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341,828
of 399,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.