↓ Skip to main content

Avaliação do acompanhamento de pacientes adultos com hipertensão arterial e ou diabetes melito pela Estratégia Saúde da Família e identificação de fatores associados, Cambé-PR, Brasil, 2012

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avaliação do acompanhamento de pacientes adultos com hipertensão arterial e ou diabetes melito pela Estratégia Saúde da Família e identificação de fatores associados, Cambé-PR, Brasil, 2012
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, January 2016
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742016000100012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bárbara Radigonda, Regina Kazue Tanno de Souza, Luiz Cordoni, Ana Maria Rigo Silva

Abstract

to assess the follow-up of adults with arterial hypertension and/or diabetes by the Family Health teams and identify associated factors in the city of Cambé-PR, Brazil, in 2012. evaluation research using document analysis with calculation of the following indicators: coverage and concentration of household visits, medical consultation, and nursing consultation. 386 of the 687 individuals with hypertension or diabetes had records of their condition at the Primary Healthcare Units; medical consultation coverage (69.2%) was regular, while nursing consultation (1.5%) and household visit (12.2%) indices were critical; concentration was critical for household visits, nursing consultations, and medical consultations for high-risk groups; medical consultation coverage was higher among women, those with lower schooling, and those attending Primary Healthcare Units (p<0.05), but did not differ with regard to cardiovascular risk. follow-up by the teams does not meet the healthcare standard set for the programmatic groups analyzed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 34%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 18 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#324
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341,828
of 399,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.